[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <16932826-fcc2-49d3-95ab-201eff729360@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 16:36:05 +0800
From: Jinlong Mao <quic_jinlmao@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Mathieu Poirier
<mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
"Mike Leach" <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>, Leo
Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson
<andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring
<robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tingwei Zhang <quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>,
Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@...cinc.com>,
Tao Zhang
<quic_taozha@...cinc.com>, <coresight@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: coresight: Update the pattern of
ete node name
On 12/21/2023 4:17 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 21/12/2023 09:15, Jinlong Mao wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/21/2023 4:12 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 21/12/2023 04:28, Jinlong Mao wrote:
>>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml
>>>>>> index f725e6940993..cbf583d34029 100644
>>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml
>>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml
>>>>>> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ description: |
>>>>>>
>>>>>> properties:
>>>>>> $nodename:
>>>>>> - pattern: "^ete([0-9a-f]+)$"
>>>>>> + pattern: "^ete-([0-9a-f]+)$"
>>>>>
>>>>> My concerns are not resolved. Why is it here in the first place?
>>>>
>>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>>
>>>> ETE is acronym of embedded trace extension. The number of the name is
>>>> the same as the number of the CPU it belongs to.
>>>
>>> This is obvious and was not my question.
>>
>> Do you mean why the pattern match of the node name is added here ?
>
> Yes, especially that it is requiring a non-generic name.
>
>>
>> This node should not have the node name match, right ?
>
> Usually. For sure shouldn't be for non-generic names.
>
Hi Suzuki,
Can we remove the pattern match of the node name and use a generic name
"ete" for the ete DT nodes ?
Thanks
Jinlong Mao
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists