[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231221004004.dwmzzwzvh53po6ai@zenone.zhora.eu>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 01:40:04 +0100
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: "wsa@...nel.org" <wsa@...nel.org>,
Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"gregory.clement@...tlin.com" <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: add bus-reset-gpios property
Hi Krzysztof,
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 08:22:38AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/12/2023 00:25, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >>> I personally would like to see it accepted but it seems there are
> >>> objections to this approach. I've yet to come up with anything better to
> >>> offer as an alternative.
> >>
> >> I see. Thanks for the heads up!
> >
> > I'm also inclined to have this merged. A real fix might take
> > time.
>
> NAK
>
> If you intend to merge it, then please carry:
>
> Nacked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
ehehe... too much drama here :-)
I know you nacked this patch and of course won't be taken
anywhere.
I was actually referring to Chris previous patch rather than this
one.
Andi
> The patchset is wrong and made of wrong reasons. It claimed GPIO cannot
> be shared, which is simply not true.
>
> >
> > Myself I have developed a prototype for what has been discussed
> > with Krzysztof, but I don't know how much time it will take to
> > get things done.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists