[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1583609.1703155848@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 10:50:48 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the vfs-brauner tree
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> It looks like the afs tree has been rebased since (part of) it was merged
> into the vfs-brauner tree. :-(
What's the best way to deal with this? Push these two patches down to the
bottom of the branches and then base both trees off those two same commits?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists