lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20231220205705.64de0424@gandalf.local.home> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 20:57:05 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Tzvetomir Stoyanov <tz.stoyanov@...il.com>, Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@...gle.com>, Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 15/15] tracing: Update subbuffer with kilobytes not page order On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:26:21 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote: > > If the user specifies 3 via: > > > > echo 3 > buffer_subbuf_size_kb > > > > Then the sub-buffer size will round up to 4kb (on a 4kb page size system). > > > > If they specify: > > > > echo 6 > buffer_subbuf_size_kb > > > > The sub-buffer size will become 8kb. > > I think this is better interface. Can we apply this earlier in the series > to avoid rewriting the document and test code? I kept it separate for testing purposes. Through out all this, it was a good way to make sure the two approaches were compatible. I still like to keep them separate as that's the way it was developed. It's good to keep that history. -- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists