[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231221-notieren-abbaggern-98327276ee4c@brauner>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 13:29:33 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the block tree
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 08:11:34PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 12/20/23 7:56 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The following commits are also in the vfs-brauner tree as different
> > commits (but the same patches):
> >
> > 24fa3ae9467f ("file: remove pointless wrapper")
> > 253ca8678d30 ("Improve __fget_files_rcu() code generation (and thus __fget_light())")
> > 372a34e66fb7 ("fs: replace f_rcuhead with f_task_work")
> > 4e94ddfe2aab ("file: remove __receive_fd()")
> > 7cb537b6f6d7 ("file: massage cleanup of files that failed to open")
> > a88c955fcfb4 ("file: s/close_fd_get_file()/file_close_fd()/g")
> > eac9189c9619 ("file: stop exposing receive_fd_user()")
>
> Hmm confused, assumed vfs.file got rebased again, but doesn't look to be
> the case. Christian?
Nope, vfs.file definitely didn't get rebased. That was just me being
stupid and not merging vfs.file cleanly into vfs.all. Sorry about this.
Fixed now.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists