linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the block tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 13:29:33 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the block tree

On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 08:11:34PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 12/20/23 7:56 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > The following commits are also in the vfs-brauner tree as different
> > commits (but the same patches):
> > 
> >   24fa3ae9467f ("file: remove pointless wrapper")
> >   253ca8678d30 ("Improve __fget_files_rcu() code generation (and thus __fget_light())")
> >   372a34e66fb7 ("fs: replace f_rcuhead with f_task_work")
> >   4e94ddfe2aab ("file: remove __receive_fd()")
> >   7cb537b6f6d7 ("file: massage cleanup of files that failed to open")
> >   a88c955fcfb4 ("file: s/close_fd_get_file()/file_close_fd()/g")
> >   eac9189c9619 ("file: stop exposing receive_fd_user()")
> 
> Hmm confused, assumed vfs.file got rebased again, but doesn't look to be
> the case. Christian?

Nope, vfs.file definitely didn't get rebased. That was just me being
stupid and not merging vfs.file cleanly into vfs.all. Sorry about this.
Fixed now.