linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 13/17] writeback: Factor writeback_get_folio() out of write_cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 13:31:49 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/17] writeback: Factor writeback_get_folio() out of
 write_cache_pages()

On Thu 21-12-23 13:25:35, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 12:41:53PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > But I'd note that the call stack depth of similarly called helper functions
> > (with more to come later in the series) is getting a bit confusing. Maybe
> > we should inline writeback_get_next() into its single caller
> > writeback_get_folio() to reduce confusion a bit...
> 
> I just hacked that up based on the fully applied series and that looks
> good to me.

Yeah, cleanup on top works for me so that you don't have to rebase.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR