[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231221125801.GG10102@google.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 12:58:01 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Sean Young <sean@...s.org>, Flavio Suligoi <f.suligoi@...m.it>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: (subset) linux-next: build failure after merge of the pwm tree
On Thu, 21 Dec 2023, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 16:58:05 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > After merging the backlight tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/video/backlight/mp3309c.c: In function 'mp3309c_bl_update_status':
> > drivers/video/backlight/mp3309c.c:134:23: error: implicit declaration of function 'pwm_apply_state'; did you mean 'pwm_apply_args'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 134 | ret = pwm_apply_state(chip->pwmd, &pwmstate);
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > | pwm_apply_args
> >
> > [...]
>
> Applied, thanks!
>
> [1/1] linux-next: build failure after merge of the pwm tree
> commit: f7baa9ccef93ba1c36a8ecf58c2f4e86fb3181b9
Actually it's:
f7baa9ccef93b ("backlight: mp3309c: Rename pwm_apply_state() to pwm_apply_might_sleep()")
But don't bank on the commit ID staying the same.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists