linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 00/26] Add thermal zones names and new registration func

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 14:54:13 +0100
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, rui.zhang@...el.com, lukasz.luba@....com,
 linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/26] Add thermal zones names and new registration
 func

Il 21/12/23 14:38, Rafael J. Wysocki ha scritto:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 1:48 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com> wrote:
>>
>> ** This RFC was sent only to thermal API maintainers + reviewers on purpose **
>>
>> As per previous discussion with Daniel [1], I've prepared this series adding
>> a new struct thermal_zone_device_params, used in a new registration function
>> for thermal zones thermal_zone_device_register(), deprecating and, finally,
>> replacing functions thermal_tripless_zone_device_register() and
>> thermal_zone_device_register_with_trips().
>>
>> The new flow to register a thermal zone becomes the following:
>>   - Declare a struct thermal_zone_device_params (`tzp` in this example)
>>   - Fill in all the params (instead of passing all of them to a function)
>>   - Call thermal_zone_device_register(tzp)
>>
>> Moreover, I've also introduced the concept of `name` for a thermal zone,
>> and set, as suggested, a constraint for which:
>>   - Multiple thermal zones can have the same `type` (so, no change), and
>>   - A thermal zone's name must be *unique*.
>>
>> This should then help (in a later series?) to disambiguate thermal zone
>> name vs type, as most of (if not all) the users seem to actually be
>> misusing the TZ type referring to / using it as a TZ name.
>>
>> Please note that this series is currently a RFC because it's apparently
>> growing bigger than I wanted - and because I probably have to add some
>> more code on top. Before doing so, I'm trying to get feedback on what
>> I've done until now.
> 
> And it is very unlikely that I will be able to provide any useful
> feedback on this series before 6.8-rc1 is out.
> 
> Thanks!

Thanks for telling - but hey, obviously there's no rush, please take your time.

Cheers!
Angelo