linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 02/15] ring-buffer: Page size per ring buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:57:52 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland
 <mark.rutland@....com>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Tzvetomir Stoyanov
 <tz.stoyanov@...il.com>, Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@...gle.com>, Kent
 Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/15] ring-buffer: Page size per ring buffer

On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 14:51:29 +0000
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM> wrote:

> > I think 1kb units is perfectly fine (patch 15 changes to kb units). The
> > interface says its to define the minimal size of the sub-buffer, not the
> > actual size.  
> 
> I didn't read that far through :-(
> 

Well, this isn't a normal patch series as I took the work from Tzvetomir
back from 2021, and started massaging them. I wanted to keep Tzvetomir's
original authorship even though he's not working on it, so I just applied
his patches as-is and then added patches on top of them, to denote what I
did and what he did.

This is why I never modified the first 5 patches of this series, except for
subject lines and change logs.

-- Steve