[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB527672402F30F701A5EA53028C94A@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 07:12:36 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
CC: "Yang, Weijiang" <weijiang.yang@...el.com>, "joro@...tes.org"
<joro@...tes.org>, "alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"jgg@...dia.com" <jgg@...dia.com>, "robin.murphy@....com"
<robin.murphy@....com>, "baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com"
<baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>, "cohuck@...hat.com" <cohuck@...hat.com>,
"eric.auger@...hat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>, "nicolinc@...dia.com"
<nicolinc@...dia.com>, "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com" <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
"chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com" <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>,
"yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com" <yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com>, "peterx@...hat.com"
<peterx@...hat.com>, "jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com"
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>, "lulu@...hat.com" <lulu@...hat.com>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, "Duan,
Zhenzhong" <zhenzhong.duan@...el.com>, "joao.m.martins@...cle.com"
<joao.m.martins@...cle.com>, "Zeng, Xin" <xin.zeng@...el.com>, "Zhao, Yan Y"
<yan.y.zhao@...el.com>, "j.granados@...sung.com" <j.granados@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 9/9] iommu/vt-d: Add iotlb flush for nested domain
> From: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
> Sent: Friday, December 22, 2023 3:02 PM
>
>
> > On Dec 22, 2023, at 14:47, Tian, Kevin <kevin.tian@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> From: Yang, Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
> >> Sent: Friday, December 22, 2023 11:56 AM
> >>> +
> >>> + xa_for_each(&domain->iommu_array, i, info) {
> >>> + nested_flush_pasid_iotlb(info->iommu, domain, addr,
> >> npages, 0);
> >>> +
> >>> + if (domain->has_iotlb_device)
> >>> + continue;
> >>
> >> Shouldn't this be if (!domain->has_iotlb_device)?
> >
> > yes that is wrong.
> >
> > actually it's weird to put domain check in a loop of domain->iommu_array.
> >
> > that check along with devtlb flush should be done out of that loop.
>
> Maybe adding a bool, set it out of the loop, check the bool in the loop.
the point is that dev iotlb doesn't rely on info->iommu:
nested_flush_dev_iotlb(domain, addr, mask, &fault);
then why do it in the loop of info->iommu?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists