[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0ab000c3-be7f-41f3-8017-28738cf0a698@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 16:04:39 +0530
From: "Mukunda,Vijendar" <vijendar.mukunda@....com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: broonie@...nel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
Basavaraj.Hiregoudar@....com, Sunil-kumar.Dommati@....com,
pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com, vinod.koul@...el.com,
venkataprasad.potturu@....com, Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] drivers: soundwire: refactor soundwire pads enable
On 22/12/23 14:51, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 22-12-23, 12:45, Mukunda,Vijendar wrote:
>> On 21/12/23 22:08, Vinod Koul wrote:
>>> so the code is copied from a GPL declared file to now and GPL + BSD one!
>>> Have you had lawyers look into this... why change one file license ?
>> As per recommendations from our legal team, we have updated the license as dual
>> one for amd_init.c file.
>> We have also observed that license terms should be updated for other files as
>> well (amd_manager.c, amd_manager.h & sdw_amd.h) as dual one, which we have
>> planned to submit as a supplement patch.
> Lets change that first before we move code from one license file to
> another
Will push the license update patch first.
>
> Btw why would you want to do the change of license form GPL to dual?
As this code being used by AMD SOF stack which uses dual license,
So we want to maintain the same license terms.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists