linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pvpanic: Don't use "proxy" headers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZYWDHzG0zDTbMwEH@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 14:37:51 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@...ch.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pvpanic: Don't use "proxy" headers

On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:08:51AM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On 2023-12-21 20:28:44+0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 06:48:49PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh  wrote:
> > > Dec 21, 2023 15:44:55 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>:

...

> > > Note:
> > > This also drops the unused include of the UAPI header
> > > which could be mentioned in the changelog.
> > 
> > Isn't it implied?
> 
> It's not covered by the subject. The message itself is fine.

Ah, I thought you are talking about the body of the message.

> But it's only a tiny nitpick anyways.

Yes, I don't think we need a new iteration due to this.

Thank you for the review!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko