[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZYWZRWvwBTdKNHF-@rigel>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 22:12:21 +0800
From: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: andy@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] gpiolib: cdev: replace locking wrappers for
gpio_device with guards
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 03:05:41PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 1:47 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 05:48:52PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 09:20:40AM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote:
> > > > Replace the wrapping functions that inhibit removal of the gpio chip
> > >
> > > GPIO
> > >
> >
> > Bart, I don't care either way and not enough to respin a v3.
> > If it bothers you could you fix it on the way in?
> >
>
> Sure!
>
> > That is if you aren't too busy reversing xmas trees ;-).
> >
>
> Joke's on you, I actually do find them easier to read and try to use
> them everywhere in new code I write. :)
>
Oh, I agree - it is more readable. It just seems very timely that Andy
keeps griping about them not being inverted.
Cheers,
Kent.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists