linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 09/10] phy: qualcomm: phy-qcom-qmp-ufs: Rectify SM8550 UFS HS-G4 PHY Settings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 21:19:18 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Can Guo <quic_cang@...cinc.com>
Cc: bvanassche@....org, mani@...nel.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
	beanhuo@...ron.com, avri.altman@....com, junwoo80.lee@...sung.com,
	martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
	Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
	Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
	"open list:GENERIC PHY FRAMEWORK" <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/10] phy: qualcomm: phy-qcom-qmp-ufs: Rectify SM8550
 UFS HS-G4 PHY Settings

On 22-12-23, 15:41, Can Guo wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
> 
> On 12/22/2023 1:13 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On 02-12-23, 04:36, Can Guo wrote:
> > > The registers, which are being touched in current SM8550 UFS PHY settings,
> > > and the values being programmed are mainly the ones working for HS-G4 mode,
> > > meanwhile, there are also a few ones somehow taken from HS-G5 PHY settings.
> > > However, even consider HS-G4 mode only, some of them are incorrect and some
> > > are missing. Rectify the HS-G4 PHY settings by strictly aligning with the
> > > SM8550 UFS PHY Hardware Programming Guide suggested HS-G4 PHY settings.
> > 
> > This fails for me, as I have picked Abels offset series, can you please
> > rebase these two patches and send
> > 
> In v8, I rebased the two changes to linux-next. Is the ask there to rebase
> the two changes to phy/next?

Yes these two failed to apply for me, pls rebase and post

-- 
~Vinod