[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdazVUJnfEJTXmAErfxptgnNGByQPU=aLz2RReZD_3GyyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2023 01:18:19 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Hoan Tran <hoan@...amperecomputing.com>, Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, Fu Wei <wefu@...hat.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/8] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add thead,th1520-pinctrl bindings
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 3:07 PM Emil Renner Berthing
<emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com> wrote:
> Linus Walleij wrote:
> > Do the people designing boards using this have better documentation than what
> > you have? Then either get that documentation or just don't give them
> > too much rope.
>
> We can certainly prevent Linux from ever combining the strong pull-up with the
> regular bias, but that doesn't mean that the vendor u-boot can't find a use for
> it and might hand over pins in such states Linux then wouldn't know how to
> handle.
What you are saying is "there might be people who have access to
documentation that I don't have so they do this crazy thing".
Clearly you cannot design for that.
Print a big fat warning and fail probe if it happens.
If U-Boot is using some feature you definitely cannot deal with if this
happens, and then the people doing this can very well write a patch for
the kernel.
> If you think its better we could just postpone that problem to when/if it ever
> happens.
Yes please.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists