Message-ID: <6f238675-ec98-4d15-8041-ab15921ba053@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2023 09:19:37 +0800
From: Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
 will@...nel.org, robin.murphy@....com, lukas@...ner.de,
 linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 2/4] iommu/vt-d: don's issue devTLB flush request
 when device is disconnected


On 12/25/2023 6:43 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 12:06:55AM -0500, Ethan Zhao wrote:
>> For those endpoint devices connect to system via hotplug capable ports,
>> users could request a warm reset to the device by flapping device's link
>> through setting the slot's link control register, as pciehpt_ist() DLLSC
>> interrupt sequence response, pciehp will unload the device driver and
>> then power it off. thus cause an IOMMU devTLB flush request for device to
>> be sent and a long time completion/timeout waiting in interrupt context.
> s/don's/don't/ (in subject)
> s/pciehpt_ist/pciehp_ist/
>
> IIUC you are referring to a specific PCIe transaction, so unless
> there's another spec that defines "devTLB flush request", please use
> the actual PCIe transaction name ("ATS Invalidate Request") as Lukas
> suggested.
>
> There's no point in using an informal name that we assume "all
> iommu/PCIe guys could understand."  It's better to use a term that
> anybody can find by searching the spec.

agree.  will revise them together.

Thanks,

Ethan

>
>> That would cause following continuous hard lockup warning and system hang
>>
>> [ 4211.433662] pcieport 0000:17:01.0: pciehp: Slot(108): Link Down
>> [ 4211.433664] pcieport 0000:17:01.0: pciehp: Slot(108): Card not present
>> [ 4223.822591] NMI watchdog: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 144
>> [ 4223.822622] CPU: 144 PID: 1422 Comm: irq/57-pciehp Kdump: loaded Tainted: G S
>>           OE    kernel version xxxx
>> [ 4223.822623] Hardware name: vendorname xxxx 666-106,
>> BIOS 01.01.02.03.01 05/15/2023
>> [ 4223.822623] RIP: 0010:qi_submit_sync+0x2c0/0x490
>> [ 4223.822624] Code: 48 be 00 00 00 00 00 08 00 00 49 85 74 24 20 0f 95 c1 48 8b
>>   57 10 83 c1 04 83 3c 1a 03 0f 84 a2 01 00 00 49 8b 04 24 8b 70 34 <40> f6 c6 1
>> 0 74 17 49 8b 04 24 8b 80 80 00 00 00 89 c2 d3 fa 41 39
>> [ 4223.822624] RSP: 0018:ffffc4f074f0bbb8 EFLAGS: 00000093
>> [ 4223.822625] RAX: ffffc4f040059000 RBX: 0000000000000014 RCX: 0000000000000005
>> [ 4223.822625] RDX: ffff9f3841315800 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff9f38401a8340
>> [ 4223.822625] RBP: ffff9f38401a8340 R08: ffffc4f074f0bc00 R09: 0000000000000000
>> [ 4223.822626] R10: 0000000000000010 R11: 0000000000000018 R12: ffff9f384005e200
>> [ 4223.822626] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000046 R15: 0000000000000004
>> [ 4223.822626] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa237ae400000(0000)
>> knlGS:0000000000000000
>> [ 4223.822627] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>> [ 4223.822627] CR2: 00007ffe86515d80 CR3: 000002fd3000a001 CR4: 0000000000770ee0
>> [ 4223.822627] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>> [ 4223.822628] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe07f0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>> [ 4223.822628] PKRU: 55555554
>> [ 4223.822628] Call Trace:
>> [ 4223.822628]  qi_flush_dev_iotlb+0xb1/0xd0
>> [ 4223.822628]  __dmar_remove_one_dev_info+0x224/0x250
>> [ 4223.822629]  dmar_remove_one_dev_info+0x3e/0x50
>> [ 4223.822629]  intel_iommu_release_device+0x1f/0x30
>> [ 4223.822629]  iommu_release_device+0x33/0x60
>> [ 4223.822629]  iommu_bus_notifier+0x7f/0x90
>> [ 4223.822630]  blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0x90
>> [ 4223.822630]  device_del+0x2e5/0x420
>> [ 4223.822630]  pci_remove_bus_device+0x70/0x110
>> [ 4223.822630]  pciehp_unconfigure_device+0x7c/0x130
>> [ 4223.822631]  pciehp_disable_slot+0x6b/0x100
>> [ 4223.822631]  pciehp_handle_presence_or_link_change+0xd8/0x320
>> [ 4223.822631]  pciehp_ist+0x176/0x180
>> [ 4223.822631]  ? irq_finalize_oneshot.part.50+0x110/0x110
>> [ 4223.822632]  irq_thread_fn+0x19/0x50
>> [ 4223.822632]  irq_thread+0x104/0x190
>> [ 4223.822632]  ? irq_forced_thread_fn+0x90/0x90
>> [ 4223.822632]  ? irq_thread_check_affinity+0xe0/0xe0
>> [ 4223.822633]  kthread+0x114/0x130
>> [ 4223.822633]  ? __kthread_cancel_work+0x40/0x40
>> [ 4223.822633]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>> [ 4223.822633] Kernel panic - not syncing: Hard LOCKUP
>> [ 4223.822634] CPU: 144 PID: 1422 Comm: irq/57-pciehp Kdump: loaded Tainted: G S
>>           OE     kernel version xxxx
>> [ 4223.822634] Hardware name: vendorname xxxx 666-106,
>> BIOS 01.01.02.03.01 05/15/2023
>> [ 4223.822634] Call Trace:
>> [ 4223.822634]  <NMI>
>> [ 4223.822635]  dump_stack+0x6d/0x88
>> [ 4223.822635]  panic+0x101/0x2d0
>> [ 4223.822635]  ? ret_from_fork+0x11/0x30
>> [ 4223.822635]  nmi_panic.cold.14+0xc/0xc
>> [ 4223.822636]  watchdog_overflow_callback.cold.8+0x6d/0x81
>> [ 4223.822636]  __perf_event_overflow+0x4f/0xf0
>> [ 4223.822636]  handle_pmi_common+0x1ef/0x290
>> [ 4223.822636]  ? __set_pte_vaddr+0x28/0x40
>> [ 4223.822637]  ? flush_tlb_one_kernel+0xa/0x20
>> [ 4223.822637]  ? __native_set_fixmap+0x24/0x30
>> [ 4223.822637]  ? ghes_copy_tofrom_phys+0x70/0x100
>> [ 4223.822637]  ? __ghes_peek_estatus.isra.16+0x49/0xa0
>> [ 4223.822637]  intel_pmu_handle_irq+0xba/0x2b0
>> [ 4223.822638]  perf_event_nmi_handler+0x24/0x40
>> [ 4223.822638]  nmi_handle+0x4d/0xf0
>> [ 4223.822638]  default_do_nmi+0x49/0x100
>> [ 4223.822638]  exc_nmi+0x134/0x180
>> [ 4223.822639]  end_repeat_nmi+0x16/0x67
>> [ 4223.822639] RIP: 0010:qi_submit_sync+0x2c0/0x490
>> [ 4223.822639] Code: 48 be 00 00 00 00 00 08 00 00 49 85 74 24 20 0f 95 c1 48 8b
>>   57 10 83 c1 04 83 3c 1a 03 0f 84 a2 01 00 00 49 8b 04 24 8b 70 34 <40> f6 c6 10
>>   74 17 49 8b 04 24 8b 80 80 00 00 00 89 c2 d3 fa 41 39
>> [ 4223.822640] RSP: 0018:ffffc4f074f0bbb8 EFLAGS: 00000093
>> [ 4223.822640] RAX: ffffc4f040059000 RBX: 0000000000000014 RCX: 0000000000000005
>> [ 4223.822640] RDX: ffff9f3841315800 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff9f38401a8340
>> [ 4223.822641] RBP: ffff9f38401a8340 R08: ffffc4f074f0bc00 R09: 0000000000000000
>> [ 4223.822641] R10: 0000000000000010 R11: 0000000000000018 R12: ffff9f384005e200
>> [ 4223.822641] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000046 R15: 0000000000000004
>> [ 4223.822641]  ? qi_submit_sync+0x2c0/0x490
>> [ 4223.822642]  ? qi_submit_sync+0x2c0/0x490
>> [ 4223.822642]  </NMI>
>> [ 4223.822642]  qi_flush_dev_iotlb+0xb1/0xd0
>> [ 4223.822642]  __dmar_remove_one_dev_info+0x224/0x250
>> [ 4223.822643]  dmar_remove_one_dev_info+0x3e/0x50
>> [ 4223.822643]  intel_iommu_release_device+0x1f/0x30
>> [ 4223.822643]  iommu_release_device+0x33/0x60
>> [ 4223.822643]  iommu_bus_notifier+0x7f/0x90
>> [ 4223.822644]  blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0x90
>> [ 4223.822644]  device_del+0x2e5/0x420
>> [ 4223.822644]  pci_remove_bus_device+0x70/0x110
>> [ 4223.822644]  pciehp_unconfigure_device+0x7c/0x130
>> [ 4223.822644]  pciehp_disable_slot+0x6b/0x100
>> [ 4223.822645]  pciehp_handle_presence_or_link_change+0xd8/0x320
>> [ 4223.822645]  pciehp_ist+0x176/0x180
>> [ 4223.822645]  ? irq_finalize_oneshot.part.50+0x110/0x110
>> [ 4223.822645]  irq_thread_fn+0x19/0x50
>> [ 4223.822646]  irq_thread+0x104/0x190
>> [ 4223.822646]  ? irq_forced_thread_fn+0x90/0x90
>> [ 4223.822646]  ? irq_thread_check_affinity+0xe0/0xe0
>> [ 4223.822646]  kthread+0x114/0x130
>> [ 4223.822647]  ? __kthread_cancel_work+0x40/0x40
>> [ 4223.822647]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>> [ 4223.822647] Kernel Offset: 0x6400000 from 0xffffffff81000000 (relocation
>> range: 0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffffbfffffff)
> The timestamps don't help understand the problem, so you could remove
> them so they aren't a distraction.
>
>> Fix it by checking the device's error_state in
>> devtlb_invalidation_with_pasid() to avoid sending meaningless devTLB flush
>> request to link down device that is set to pci_channel_io_perm_failure and
>> then powered off in
> A pci_dev_is_disconnected() is racy in this context, so this by itself
> doesn't look like a complete "fix".
>
>> pciehp_ist()
>>     pciehp_handle_presence_or_link_change()
>>       pciehp_disable_slot()
>>         remove_board()
>>           pciehp_unconfigure_device()
> There are some interesting steps missing here between
> pciehp_unconfigure_device() and devtlb_invalidation_with_pasid().
>
> devtlb_invalidation_with_pasid() is Intel-specific.  ATS Invalidate
> Requests are not Intel-specific, so all IOMMU drivers must have to
> deal with the case of an ATS Invalidate Request where we never receive
> a corresponding ATS Invalidate Completion.  Do other IOMMUs like AMD
> and ARM have a similar issue?
>
>> For SAVE_REMOVAL unplug, link is alive when iommu releases devcie and
>> issues devTLB invalidate request, wouldn't trigger such issue.
>>
>> This patch works for all links of SURPPRISE_REMOVAL unplug operations.
> s/devcie/device/
>
> Writing "SAVE_REMOVAL" and "SURPPRISE_REMOVAL" in all caps with an
> underscore makes them look like identifiers.  But neither appears in
> the kernel source.  Write them as normal English words, e.g., "save
> removal" instead (though I suspect you mean "safe removal"?).
>
> s/surpprise/surprise/
>
> It's not completely obvious that a fix that works for the safe removal
> case also works for the surprise removal case.  Can you briefly
> explain why it does?
>
>> Tested-by: Haorong Ye <yehaorong@...edance.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c | 3 +++
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
>> index 74e8e4c17e81..7dbee9931eb6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
>> @@ -481,6 +481,9 @@ devtlb_invalidation_with_pasid(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
>>   	if (!info || !info->ats_enabled)
>>   		return;
>>   
>> +	if (pci_dev_is_disconnected(to_pci_dev(dev)))
>> +		return;
>> +
>>   	sid = info->bus << 8 | info->devfn;
>>   	qdep = info->ats_qdep;
>>   	pfsid = info->pfsid;
> This goes on to call qi_submit_sync(), which contains a restart: loop.
> I don't know the programming model there, but it looks possible that
> qi_submit_sync() and qi_check_fault() might not handle the case of an
> unreachable device correctly.  There should be a way to exit that
> restart: loop in cases where the device doesn't respond at all.
>
> Bjorn

Powered by blists - more mailing lists