linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] dt-bindings: iio: pressure: honeywell,mprls0025pa.yaml add pressure-triplet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6eb809bb-c445-45fa-ae94-5faa05534da2@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2023 14:37:00 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Petre Rodan <petre.rodan@...dimension.ro>
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>,
 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
 Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] dt-bindings: iio: pressure:
 honeywell,mprls0025pa.yaml add pressure-triplet

On 25/12/2023 14:34, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> +oneOf:
>>>> +  - required:
>>>> +      - honeywell,pmin-pascal
>>>> +      - honeywell,pmax-pascal
>>>> +  - required:
>>>> +      - honeywell,pressure-triplet
>>>> +
>>>> +allOf:
>>>> +  - if:
>>>> +      required:
>>>> +        - honeywell,pressure-triplet
>>>> +    then:
>>>> +      properties:
>>>> +        honeywell,pmin-pascal: false
>>>> +        honeywell,pmax-pascal: false
>>>
>>> This allOf is not needed.
>>
>> speaking for intricacies, if the allOf is removed, then a binding containing
>>
>> honeywell,pmax-pascal = <840000>;
>> honeywell,pressure-triplet = "0015PA";
>>
>> would be considered to be correct by the schema, but that would be the incorrect
>> result. so afaict allOf needs to stay, and so does the redundant text.
> 
> Really? Did you test it?

Hm, indeed, on pmin/pmax would not trigger first required case. OK, then
this part make sense.

Best regards,
Krzysztof