linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix WARNING in lock_two

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2023 10:46:35 +0800
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
CC: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@...com>,
	<syzbot+2c4a3b922a860084cc7f@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
	<adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>, yangerkun <yangerkun@...wei.com>, Baokun
 Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix WARNING in lock_two_nondirectories

On 2023/12/25 10:11, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 09:38:51AM +0800, Baokun Li wrote:
>> Marking the boot loader inode as a bad inode here is useless,
>> EXT4_IGET_BAD allows us to get a bad boot loader inode.
>> In my opinion, it doesn't make sense to call lock_two_nondirectories()
>> here to determine if the inode is a regular file or not, since the logic
>> for dealing with non-regular files comes after the locking, so calling
>> lock_two_inodes() directly here will suffice.
> This is all very silly, and why I consider this sort of thing pure
> syzkaller noise.  It really doesn't protect against any real threat,
> and it encourages people to put all sorts of random crud in kernel
> code, all in the name of trying to shut up syzbot.
Indeed, the warning is meaningless, but it is undeniable that if the
user can easily trigger the warning, something is wrong with the code.
> If we *are* going to care about shutting up syzkaller, the right
> approach is to simply add a check in swap_inode_boot_loader() which
> causes it to call ext4_error() and declare the file system corrupted
> if the bootloader inode is not a regular file, and then return
> -EFSCORRUPTED.
>
> We don't need to add random hacks to ext4_iget(), or in other places...
>
>     	      	     	    	     - Ted
Without considering the case where the boot loader inode is
uninitialized, I think this is fine and the logic to determine if the boot
loader inode is initialized and to initialize it can be removed.

Merry Christmas!
-- 
With Best Regards,
Baokun Li
.