| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2023 07:31:49 +0800 From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com> To: fuqiang wang <fuqiang.wang@...ystack.cn>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86/kexec: fix potential cmem->ranges out of bounds On 12/25/23 at 09:44pm, fuqiang wang wrote: > 在 2023/12/24 12:46, Baoquan He 写道: > > > Rethink about this, seems above code comment is fine to be kept, and the > > same feeling about the elfheader region split from crashk_res. So, other > > than the patch log concerns, this patch looks good to me. Let's see if > > other people has concern about the newly added comments. > > > > Hi Baoquan > > Thank you very much for your suggestions in the patch log and code comments. I > have learned a lot and I will gradually improve. > > I found the following patch in linux-next: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=666ef13f2870c43ba8a402ec8a3cedf6eb6c6f5a > > I'm sorry, It's my mistake. Do you think it is still necessary to merge this > patch based on that ? That patch need be withdrew because that is not expected according to our discussion. Hi Andrew, Could you withdraw the patch fuqiang mentioned? x86/crash: fix potential cmem->ranges array overflow https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=666ef13f2870c43ba8a402ec8a3cedf6eb6c6f5a Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists