| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202312260852.0ge5O8IL-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2023 08:54:01 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Gonglei <arei.gonglei@...wei.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
cocci@...ia.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: virtio - Less function calls in
__virtio_crypto_akcipher_do_req() after error detection
Hi Markus,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on herbert-cryptodev-2.6/master]
[also build test ERROR on herbert-crypto-2.6/master linus/master v6.7-rc7 next-20231222]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Markus-Elfring/crypto-virtio-Less-function-calls-in-__virtio_crypto_akcipher_do_req-after-error-detection/20231225-154431
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/herbert/cryptodev-2.6.git master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2413f22f-f0c3-45e0-9f6b-a551bdf0f54c%40web.de
patch subject: [PATCH] crypto: virtio - Less function calls in __virtio_crypto_akcipher_do_req() after error detection
config: arm-randconfig-001-20231225 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231226/202312260852.0ge5O8IL-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 16.0.4 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git ae42196bc493ffe877a7e3dff8be32035dea4d07)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231226/202312260852.0ge5O8IL-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312260852.0ge5O8IL-lkp@intel.com/
All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_akcipher_algs.c:281:1: error: use of undeclared identifier 'free_src'; did you mean 'free_irq'?
free_src;
^~~~~~~~
free_irq
include/linux/interrupt.h:196:20: note: 'free_irq' declared here
extern const void *free_irq(unsigned int, void *);
^
>> drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_akcipher_algs.c:257:9: error: use of undeclared label 'free_src'
goto free_src;
^
>> drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_akcipher_algs.c:281:1: warning: expression result unused [-Wunused-value]
free_src;
^~~~~~~~
1 warning and 2 errors generated.
vim +281 drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_akcipher_algs.c
218
219 static int __virtio_crypto_akcipher_do_req(struct virtio_crypto_akcipher_request *vc_akcipher_req,
220 struct akcipher_request *req, struct data_queue *data_vq)
221 {
222 struct virtio_crypto_akcipher_ctx *ctx = vc_akcipher_req->akcipher_ctx;
223 struct virtio_crypto_request *vc_req = &vc_akcipher_req->base;
224 struct virtio_crypto *vcrypto = ctx->vcrypto;
225 struct virtio_crypto_op_data_req *req_data = vc_req->req_data;
226 struct scatterlist *sgs[4], outhdr_sg, inhdr_sg, srcdata_sg, dstdata_sg;
227 void *src_buf, *dst_buf = NULL;
228 unsigned int num_out = 0, num_in = 0;
229 int node = dev_to_node(&vcrypto->vdev->dev);
230 unsigned long flags;
231 int ret;
232 bool verify = vc_akcipher_req->opcode == VIRTIO_CRYPTO_AKCIPHER_VERIFY;
233 unsigned int src_len = verify ? req->src_len + req->dst_len : req->src_len;
234
235 /* out header */
236 sg_init_one(&outhdr_sg, req_data, sizeof(*req_data));
237 sgs[num_out++] = &outhdr_sg;
238
239 /* src data */
240 src_buf = kcalloc_node(src_len, 1, GFP_KERNEL, node);
241 if (!src_buf)
242 return -ENOMEM;
243
244 if (verify) {
245 /* for verify operation, both src and dst data work as OUT direction */
246 sg_copy_to_buffer(req->src, sg_nents(req->src), src_buf, src_len);
247 sg_init_one(&srcdata_sg, src_buf, src_len);
248 sgs[num_out++] = &srcdata_sg;
249 } else {
250 sg_copy_to_buffer(req->src, sg_nents(req->src), src_buf, src_len);
251 sg_init_one(&srcdata_sg, src_buf, src_len);
252 sgs[num_out++] = &srcdata_sg;
253
254 /* dst data */
255 dst_buf = kcalloc_node(req->dst_len, 1, GFP_KERNEL, node);
256 if (!dst_buf)
> 257 goto free_src;
258
259 sg_init_one(&dstdata_sg, dst_buf, req->dst_len);
260 sgs[num_out + num_in++] = &dstdata_sg;
261 }
262
263 vc_akcipher_req->src_buf = src_buf;
264 vc_akcipher_req->dst_buf = dst_buf;
265
266 /* in header */
267 sg_init_one(&inhdr_sg, &vc_req->status, sizeof(vc_req->status));
268 sgs[num_out + num_in++] = &inhdr_sg;
269
270 spin_lock_irqsave(&data_vq->lock, flags);
271 ret = virtqueue_add_sgs(data_vq->vq, sgs, num_out, num_in, vc_req, GFP_ATOMIC);
272 virtqueue_kick(data_vq->vq);
273 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data_vq->lock, flags);
274 if (ret)
275 goto err;
276
277 return 0;
278
279 err:
280 kfree(dst_buf);
> 281 free_src;
282 kfree(src_buf);
283 return -ENOMEM;
284 }
285
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists