[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <268f9f54-8b2a-42bb-9a5d-10bd930cb282@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2023 11:07:31 +0530
From: Krishna Kurapati PSSNV <quic_kriskura@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Bjorn
Andersson" <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio
<konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>,
"Johan
Hovold" <johan@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Thinh Nguyen
<Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>, <quic_ppratap@...cinc.com>,
<quic_jackp@...cinc.com>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: dwc3: Clean up hs_phy_irq in
binding
On 12/25/2023 6:35 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 22/12/2023 07:36, Krishna Kurapati wrote:
>> The high speed related interrupts present on QC targets are as follows:
>>
>
>
>>
>> interrupt-names:
>> - minItems: 1
>> - maxItems: 4
>> + minItems: 2
>> + maxItems: 5
>>
>> qcom,select-utmi-as-pipe-clk:
>> description:
>> @@ -361,60 +378,21 @@ allOf:
>> compatible:
>> contains:
>> enum:
>> - - qcom,ipq4019-dwc3
>
> Why do you remove it, without adding it somewhere else. Nothing in the
> commit msg explains it.
>
Apologies, Will check and add it back.
>> + - qcom,ipq5018-dwc3
>> - qcom,ipq6018-dwc3
>> - - qcom,ipq8064-dwc3
>> - qcom,ipq8074-dwc3
>> - - qcom,msm8994-dwc3
>> - - qcom,qcs404-dwc3
>> - - qcom,sc7180-dwc3
>> - - qcom,sdm670-dwc3
>> - - qcom,sdm845-dwc3
>> - - qcom,sdx55-dwc3
>> - - qcom,sdx65-dwc3
>> - - qcom,sdx75-dwc3
>> - - qcom,sm4250-dwc3
>> - - qcom,sm6350-dwc3
>> - - qcom,sm8150-dwc3
>> - - qcom,sm8250-dwc3
>> - - qcom,sm8350-dwc3
>> - - qcom,sm8450-dwc3
>> - - qcom,sm8550-dwc3
>> - - qcom,sm8650-dwc3
>> - then:
>> - properties:
>> - interrupts:
>> - items:
>> - - description: The interrupt that is asserted
>> - when a wakeup event is received on USB2 bus.
>> - - description: The interrupt that is asserted
>> - when a wakeup event is received on USB3 bus.
>> - - description: Wakeup event on DM line.
>> - - description: Wakeup event on DP line.
>> - interrupt-names:
>> - items:
>> - - const: hs_phy_irq
>> - - const: ss_phy_irq
>> - - const: dm_hs_phy_irq
>> - - const: dp_hs_phy_irq
>> -
>> - - if:
>> - properties:
>> - compatible:
>> - contains:
>> - enum:
>> - qcom,msm8953-dwc3
>> - - qcom,msm8996-dwc3
>> - qcom,msm8998-dwc3
>> - - qcom,sm6115-dwc3
>> - - qcom,sm6125-dwc3
>> + - qcom,qcm2290-dwc3
>> then:
>> properties:
>> interrupts:
>> - maxItems: 2
>> + minItems: 2
>> + maxItems: 3
>> interrupt-names:
>> items:
>> - - const: hs_phy_irq
>> + - const: pwr_event
>> + - const: qusb2_phy
>> - const: ss_phy_irq
>>
>> - if:
>> @@ -422,37 +400,21 @@ allOf:
>> compatible:
>> contains:
>> enum:
>> - - qcom,ipq5018-dwc3
>> - - qcom,ipq5332-dwc3
>> + - qcom,msm8996-dwc3
>> + - qcom,qcs404-dwc3
>> - qcom,sdm660-dwc3
>> - then:
>> - properties:
>> - interrupts:
>> - minItems: 1
>> - maxItems: 2
>> - interrupt-names:
>> - minItems: 1
>> - items:
>> - - const: hs_phy_irq
>> - - const: ss_phy_irq
>> -
>> - - if:
>> - properties:
>> - compatible:
>> - contains:
>> - enum:
>> - - qcom,sc7280-dwc3
>> + - qcom,sm6115-dwc3
>> + - qcom,sm6125-dwc3
>> then:
>> properties:
>> interrupts:
>> minItems: 3
>> maxItems: 4
>> interrupt-names:
>> - minItems: 3
>> items:
>> + - const: pwr_event
>> - const: hs_phy_irq
>> - - const: dp_hs_phy_irq
>> - - const: dm_hs_phy_irq
>> + - const: qusb2_phy
>
> Why qusb2_phy is after hs_phy_irq? In the earlier if:then: it is the
> second one.
>
In v3 as well, the hs_phy_irq is before qusb2_phy interrupt:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231211121124.4194-2-quic_kriskura@quicinc.com/
>
>> - const: ss_phy_irq
>>
>> - if:
>> @@ -460,11 +422,13 @@ allOf:
>> compatible:
>> contains:
>> enum:
>> + - qcom,ipq5332-dwc3
>> - qcom,sc8280xp-dwc3
>> - qcom,x1e80100-dwc3
>> then:
>> properties:
>> interrupts:
>> + minItems: 3
>
> Hm, why? This commit is unmanageable. Your commit msg is already huge
> but still does not explain this. Are you sure you are fixing only one
> logical thing per patch? Does not look like.
>
This is reordering the targets based on interrupts they have. I put it
in one commit because splitting this into multiple patches breaks one
thing or other. Also once I am defining permutations, I have to group
targets into these combinations in the same patch. I know this is a big
commit but it solves the interrupt cleanup and defines a way for future
targets.
Regards,
Krishna,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists