| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20231226164922.6d7132c1@jic23-huawei>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2023 16:49:22 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Petre Rodan <petre.rodan@...dimension.ro>
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andreas Klinger
<ak@...klinger.de>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Angel Iglesias
<ang.iglesiasg@...il.com>, Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] iio: pressure: mprls0025pa.c refactor
On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 16:34:53 +0200
Petre Rodan <petre.rodan@...dimension.ro> wrote:
> Refactor driver by splitting the code into core and i2c.
>
> Seemingly redundant read/write function parameters are required for
> compatibility with the SPI driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Petre Rodan <petre.rodan@...dimension.ro>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>
A few minor comments inline.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/mprls0025pa.c b/drivers/iio/pressure/mprls0025pa.c
> index e14cdee7989f..cb5d6c0cca7e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/pressure/mprls0025pa.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/mprls0025pa.c
...
> -static int mpr_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> +int mpr_common_probe(struct device *dev, const struct mpr_ops *ops, int irq)
> {
> int ret;
> struct mpr_data *data;
> struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> - struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> s64 scale, offset;
> u32 func;
>
> - if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_READ_BYTE))
> - return dev_err_probe(dev, -EOPNOTSUPP,
> - "I2C functionality not supported\n");
> -
> indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(*data));
> if (!indio_dev)
> - return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENOMEM, "couldn't get iio_dev\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> - data->client = client;
> - data->irq = client->irq;
> + data->dev = dev;
> + data->ops = ops;
> + data->irq = irq;
>
> mutex_init(&data->lock);
> init_completion(&data->completion);
> @@ -350,32 +284,36 @@ static int mpr_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> "can't get and enable vdd supply\n");
>
> - if (dev_fwnode(dev)) {
So you now rely on device_property_read_u32() failing I guess to cover this
which is fine. However do that in the earlier patch instead of burying that
change in here.
Should make it easier to tell what changed here as well.
> - ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "honeywell,pmin-pascal",
> + ret = data->ops->init(data->dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = device_property_read_u32(dev,
> + "honeywell,transfer-function", &func);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> + "honeywell,transfer-function could not be read\n");
> + data->function = func - 1;
> + if (data->function > MPR_FUNCTION_C)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
> + "honeywell,transfer-function %d invalid\n",
> + data->function);
> +
> + ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "honeywell,pmin-pascal",
> &data->pmin);
> - if (ret)
> - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> "honeywell,pmin-pascal could not be read\n");
>
> - ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "honeywell,pmax-pascal",
> - &data->pmax);
> - if (ret)
> - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> + ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "honeywell,pmax-pascal",
> + &data->pmax);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> "honeywell,pmax-pascal could not be read\n");
> - ret = device_property_read_u32(dev,
> - "honeywell,transfer-function", &func);
> - if (ret)
> - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> - "honeywell,transfer-function could not be read\n");
> - data->function = func - 1;
> - if (data->function > MPR_FUNCTION_C)
> - return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
> - "honeywell,transfer-function %d invalid\n",
> - data->function);
> - } else {
> +
> + if (data->pmin >= data->pmax)
> return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
> - "driver needs to be initialized in the dt\n");
> - }
> + "pressure limits are invalid\n");
>
> data->outmin = mpr_func_spec[data->function].output_min;
> data->outmax = mpr_func_spec[data->function].output_max;
> @@ -394,7 +332,7 @@ static int mpr_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>
> if (data->irq > 0) {
> ret = devm_request_irq(dev, data->irq, mpr_eoc_handler,
> - IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, client->name, data);
> + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, dev_name(dev), data);
Even though you'll change it again here, would have been nice to have
the alignment fixed in the earlier patch then the code update here.
> if (ret)
> return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> "request irq %d failed\n", data->irq);
> @@ -421,29 +359,8 @@ static int mpr_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>
> return 0;
> }
...
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/mprls0025pa_i2c.c b/drivers/iio/pressure/mprls0025pa_i2c.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..89d6a206192b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/mprls0025pa_i2c.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * MPRLS0025PA - Honeywell MicroPressure pressure sensor series driver
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>
> + *
> + * Data sheet:
> + * https://prod-edam.honeywell.com/content/dam/honeywell-edam/sps/siot/en-us/products/sensors/pressure-sensors/board-mount-pressure-sensors/micropressure-mpr-series/documents/sps-siot-mpr-series-datasheet-32332628-ciid-172626.pdf
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +
> +#include <linux/iio/iio.h>
Why include this? Can't see an IIO specific stuff in here.
> +
> +#include "mprls0025pa.h"
> +
> +static int mpr_i2c_init(struct device *unused)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mpr_i2c_read(struct mpr_data *data, const u8 unused, const u8 cnt)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(data->dev);
> +
> + if (cnt > MPR_MEASUREMENT_RD_SIZE)
> + return -EOVERFLOW;
> +
> + memset(data->buffer, 0, MPR_MEASUREMENT_RD_SIZE);
> + ret = i2c_master_recv(client, data->buffer, cnt);
> + if (ret != cnt) {
> + return -EIO;
As below.
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mpr_i2c_write(struct mpr_data *data, const u8 cmd, const u8 unused)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(data->dev);
> + u8 wdata[MPR_PKT_SYNC_LEN];
> +
> + memset(wdata, 0, sizeof(wdata));
> + wdata[0] = cmd;
> +
> + ret = i2c_master_send(client, wdata, MPR_PKT_SYNC_LEN);
> + if (ret != MPR_PKT_SYNC_LEN) {
No {} as per Coding Style docs for single statement blocks like this.
Ideally we tend to handle ret < 0 separately from ret != MPR_PKT_SYNC_LEN
as then we don't eat a possible more useful error code.
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists