lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2023 20:01:53 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 festevam@...il.com, helgaas@...nel.org, hongxing.zhu@....com,
 imx@...ts.linux.dev, kernel@...gutronix.de,
 krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, kw@...ux.com, l.stach@...gutronix.de,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-imx@....com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
 lpieralisi@...nel.org, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org,
 s.hauer@...gutronix.de, shawnguo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 15/16] dt-bindings: imx6q-pcie: Add iMX95 pcie endpoint
 compatible string

On 26/12/2023 17:12, Frank Li wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 08:16:17PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 24/12/2023 19:32, Frank Li wrote:
>>> Add i.MX95 PCIe "fsl,imx95-pcie-ep" compatible string.
>>> Add reg-name: "atu", "dbi2", "dma" and "app".
>>> Reuse PCI linux,pci-domain as controller id at endpoint.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> +# reuse PCI linux,pci-domain as controller id at Endpoint
>>> +  - if:
>>> +      properties:
>>> +        compatible:
>>> +          enum:
>>> +            - fsl,imx95-pcie-ep
>>> +    then:
>>> +      properties:
>>> +        linux,pci-domain: true
>>
>> Same comment: why do you need? Don't ignore my feedback. You responded
>> you will fix it, but it is still here...
> 
> DTB_CHECK report error after I remove it. linux,pci-domain is only define
> in pci, not pci-ep.

Ah, thank you, indeed.

> 
> So I add comments about this. linux,pci-domain was resued ad controller id.

However maybe there is reason why it is not for endpoints. The
description is saying it is valid only for host bridge, so maybe it
should not be used for endpoint case?
> 
> If include pci.yaml, there are too much other properties was involved, but
> not used by pci-ep.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ