linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/perf: reconcile Excess struct member kernel-doc warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2023 11:49:47 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
 intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/perf: reconcile Excess struct member
 kernel-doc warnings



On 12/26/23 09:05, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 07:20:29PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> Document nested struct members with full names as described in
>> Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst.
>>
>> i915_perf_types.h:341: warning: Excess struct member 'ptr_lock' description in 'i915_perf_stream'
>> i915_perf_types.h:341: warning: Excess struct member 'head' description in 'i915_perf_stream'
>> i915_perf_types.h:341: warning: Excess struct member 'tail' description in 'i915_perf_stream'
>> 3 warnings as Errors
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
>> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
>> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>
>> Cc: intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
>> Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> 
> 
> for the series:
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
> 
> I'm afraid patchwork was down when you sent this out.
> Could you please rebase and resend? Just to ensure
> our CI doesn't complain and then we push it.
> 

Will do. Thanks.

-- 
#Randy