linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC v2 03/11] scsi: ufs: qcom: Perform read back after writing testbus config

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231227054734.GA2814@thinkpad>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 11:17:34 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@...eaurora.org>,
	Dov Levenglick <dovl@...eaurora.org>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
	Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@...eaurora.org>,
	Gilad Broner <gbroner@...eaurora.org>,
	Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@...eaurora.org>,
	Janek Kotas <jank@...ence.com>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
	Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
	Anjana Hari <quic_ahari@...cinc.com>,
	Dolev Raviv <draviv@...eaurora.org>,
	Can Guo <quic_cang@...cinc.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 03/11] scsi: ufs: qcom: Perform read back after
 writing testbus config

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 12:25:20PM -0600, Andrew Halaney wrote:
> Currently, the testbus configuration is written and completed with an
> mb().
> 
> mb() ensure that the write completes, but completion doesn't mean
> that it isn't stored in a buffer somewhere. The recommendation for
> ensuring this bit has taken effect on the device is to perform a read
> back to force it to make it all the way to the device. This is
> documented in device-io.rst and a talk by Will Deacon on this can
> be seen over here:
> 
>     https://youtu.be/i6DayghhA8Q?si=MiyxB5cKJXSaoc01&t=1678
> 
> Let's do that to ensure the bit hits the device. Because the mb()'s
> purpose wasn't to add extra ordering (on top of the ordering guaranteed
> by writel()/readl()), it can safely be removed.
> 
> Fixes: 9c46b8676271 ("scsi: ufs-qcom: dump additional testbus registers")
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 8 +++-----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> index 4c15c8a1d058..6df2ab3b6f23 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> @@ -1332,6 +1332,9 @@ static void ufs_qcom_enable_test_bus(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
>  	ufshcd_rmwl(host->hba, UFS_REG_TEST_BUS_EN,
>  			UFS_REG_TEST_BUS_EN, REG_UFS_CFG1);
>  	ufshcd_rmwl(host->hba, TEST_BUS_EN, TEST_BUS_EN, REG_UFS_CFG1);
> +
> +	/* dummy read to ensure this has been enabled prior to returning */
> +	ufshcd_readl(host->hba, REG_UFS_CFG1);

In this case, I do not see the necessity to do a read back itself since there is
no delay afterwards nor any dependent operation in an altogether different
domain.

So removing the mb() should be sufficient.

- Mani

>  }
>  
>  static void ufs_qcom_get_default_testbus_cfg(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
> @@ -1429,11 +1432,6 @@ int ufs_qcom_testbus_config(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
>  		    (u32)host->testbus.select_minor << offset,
>  		    reg);
>  	ufs_qcom_enable_test_bus(host);
> -	/*
> -	 * Make sure the test bus configuration is
> -	 * committed before returning.
> -	 */
> -	mb();
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்