[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2bf1c818-4a7e-4fe7-9441-471de4a8c469@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 13:37:31 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Josua Mayer <josua@...id-run.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] dt-bindings: marvell: a38x: convert the soc
compatibles description to yaml
On 27/12/2023 13:05, Josua Mayer wrote:
>>> + - description: Armada 380 SoC
>>> + items:
>>> + - const: marvell,armada380
>>> +
>> Thanks for the conversion. I think this is still not what we want. The
>> main problem is of course in the original binding, not your conversion.
>> Compatible armada380 above alone is not correct. This is SoC and SoC
>> compatible cannot be used alone, because it is not specific enough to
>> differentiate boards. Same applies for further lists, which I removed
>> from the quote, for the same reasons.
>>
>> What we could do here is to fix this instead of pure conversion:
>> 1. Add this binding file with new compatibles for existing boards and
>> drop the TXT file, with explanation that you actually document properly
>> all existing board compatibles.
> So - we could add a boilerplate yaml with zero boards in conversion commit,
> and then add new or existing boards through separate commits?
boilerplate YAML file is kind of useless. It's like writing new driver
with adding empty C file and Makefile entry. I understand you want to
split logical items, but there is no logical action as "empty binding file".
>
> I feel that collecting / fixing the compatibles for all a38x based
> boards might be a lot of effort.
> Would it be acceptable to start with the few that I know / use myself?
> In addition to those already submitted I could include
> armada-388-helios4.dts.
Yes, it's fine.
>
>> 2. Add compatibles to existing DTS.
> For boards I do not know / using codenames - is there a template /
> generic description string?
>> 3. Add your new board compatibles.
>>
>> At least this is what I would do for typical cases, but as I said
>> before, Marvell here is in some surprising limbo state.
>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists