lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20231227180306.6319-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 19:03:06 +0100 From: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org> To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>, Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>, Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org, Balakrishna Godavarthi <quic_bgodavar@...cinc.com>, Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org> Subject: [PATCH] Bluetooth: qca: fix device-address endianness The WCN6855 firmware on the Lenovo ThinkPad X13s expects the Bluetooth device address in MSB order when setting it using the EDL_WRITE_BD_ADDR_OPCODE command. Presumably, this is the case for all non-ROME devices which all use the EDL_WRITE_BD_ADDR_OPCODE command for this (unlike the ROME devices which use a different command and expect the address in LSB order). Reverse the little-endian address before setting it to make sure that the address can be configured using tools like btmgmt or using the 'local-bd-address' devicetree property. Note that this can potentially break systems with boot firmware which has started relying on the broken behaviour and is incorrectly passing the address via devicetree in MSB order. Fixes: 5c0a1001c8be ("Bluetooth: hci_qca: Add helper to set device address") Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 5.1 Cc: Balakrishna Godavarthi <quic_bgodavar@...cinc.com> Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org> --- Hi Qualcomm people, Could you please verify with your documentation that all non-ROME devices expect the address provided in the EDL_WRITE_BD_ADDR_OPCODE command in MSB order? I assume this is not something that anyone would change between firmware revisions, but if that turns out to be the case, we'd need to reverse the address based on firmware revision or similar. Johan drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c index fdb0fae88d1c..29035daf21bc 100644 --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c @@ -826,11 +826,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qca_uart_setup); int qca_set_bdaddr(struct hci_dev *hdev, const bdaddr_t *bdaddr) { + bdaddr_t bdaddr_swapped; struct sk_buff *skb; int err; - skb = __hci_cmd_sync_ev(hdev, EDL_WRITE_BD_ADDR_OPCODE, 6, bdaddr, - HCI_EV_VENDOR, HCI_INIT_TIMEOUT); + baswap(&bdaddr_swapped, bdaddr); + + skb = __hci_cmd_sync_ev(hdev, EDL_WRITE_BD_ADDR_OPCODE, 6, + &bdaddr_swapped, HCI_EV_VENDOR, + HCI_INIT_TIMEOUT); if (IS_ERR(skb)) { err = PTR_ERR(skb); bt_dev_err(hdev, "QCA Change address cmd failed (%d)", err); -- 2.41.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists