lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20231227104244.824b0977ae6d4bb6b37f6f79@linux-foundation.org> Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 10:42:44 -0800 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> Cc: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, rafael@...nel.org, surenb@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, souravpanda@...gle.com Subject: Re: Sysfs one-value-per-file (was Re: [PATCH] vmstat: don't auto expand the sysfs files) On Tue, 26 Dec 2023 16:53:31 -0800 (PST) David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote: > But for existing files and conventions, I think we should settle it as > "keep doing what you've been doing for 13+ years" and don't force this > argument every time a kernel developer wants to just add one more stat. Absolutely. Let's do what makes most sense. For new things, one value per file. For stats which logically group with other existing stats, do whatever the existing other stats are currently doing.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists