[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231227030918.536413-6-haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2023 22:09:18 -0500
From: Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@...ux.intel.com>
To: bhelgaas@...gle.com,
baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com,
dwmw2@...radead.org,
will@...nel.org,
robin.murphy@....com,
lukas@...ner.de
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v8 5/5] iommu/vt-d: don't loop for timeout device-TLB invalidation request forever
When the device-TLB invalidation (ATS invalidation) timeout happens, the
qi_submit_sync() will restart and loop for the invalidation request
forever till it is done, it will block another invalidation thread such
as the fq_timer to issue invalidation request, cause the system lockup as
following
#11 [fffffe0000b1def0] end_repeat_nmi at ffffffffaa6015f8
[exception RIP: native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+92]
RIP: ffffffffa9d1025c RSP: ffffb202f268cdc8 RFLAGS: 00000002
RAX: 0000000000000101 RBX: ffffffffab36c2a0 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffffab36c2a0
RBP: ffffffffab36c2a0 R8: 0000000000000001 R9: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000010 R11: 0000000000000018 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000004 R14: ffff9e10d71b1c88 R15: ffff9e10d71b1980
ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018
--- ---
#12 [ffffb202f268cdc8] native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath at ffffffffa9d1025c
#13 [ffffb202f268cdc8] do_raw_spin_lock at ffffffffa9d121f1
#14 [ffffb202f268cdd8] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave at ffffffffaa51795b
#15 [ffffb202f268cdf8] iommu_flush_dev_iotlb at ffffffffaa20df48
#16 [ffffb202f268ce28] iommu_flush_iova at ffffffffaa20e182
#17 [ffffb202f268ce60] iova_domain_flush at ffffffffaa220e27
#18 [ffffb202f268ce70] fq_flush_timeout at ffffffffaa221c9d
#19 [ffffb202f268cea8] call_timer_fn at ffffffffa9d46661
#20 [ffffb202f268cf08] run_timer_softirq at ffffffffa9d47933
#21 [ffffb202f268cf98] __softirqentry_text_start at ffffffffaa8000e0
#22 [ffffb202f268cff0] asm_call_sysvec_on_stack at ffffffffaa60114f
--- ---
(the left part of exception see the hotplug case of ATS capable device)
If one endpoint device just no response to the device-TLB invalidation
request, but is not gone, it will bring down the whole system, to avoid
such case, don't try the timeout device-TLB request forever.
and as synchronous program model of current qi_submit_sync() implementation
we couldn't wait for the enough time as PCIe spec said 1min+50%, just break
it in current sync model. (PCIe spec r6.1, sec 10.3.1)
Signed-off-by: Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@...ux.intel.com>
---
drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
index 76903a8bf963..206ab0b7294f 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
@@ -1457,7 +1457,7 @@ int qi_submit_sync(struct intel_iommu *iommu, struct qi_desc *desc,
reclaim_free_desc(qi);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&qi->q_lock, flags);
- if (rc == -EAGAIN)
+ if (rc == -EAGAIN && type !=QI_DIOTLB_TYPE && type != QI_DEIOTLB_TYPE)
goto restart;
if (iotlb_start_ktime)
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists