linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: cdev: Split line_get_debounce

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkda9j+5zT58vqip-JjtNQEZ+dWFLxdCmmLN8GpS8R8e7zA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 01:26:13 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, 
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: cdev: Split line_get_debounce_period()
 and use

Hi Kent,

On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 3:08 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com> wrote:

> There is no escaping that my fingerprints are all over that so it does
> make sense to list me over you. Given that patch and git-tree management
> will be deferred to the GPIO subsystem/Bart, there isn't much distinction
> between a reviewer and a maintainer, so I'm ok with being listed as a
> maintainer - I'll just have to pay a bit more attention to the list mails
> than I have been.

You're doing fine with responsiveness and feedback is always timely
and verbose, so just keep doing what you do :)

Yours,
Linus Walleij