[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9711f1cf-c496-4c60-804e-78bef5c60430@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 08:15:54 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: cy_huang@...htek.com, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: adc: rtq6056: add support for the
whole RTQ6056 family
On 28/12/2023 04:51, cy_huang@...htek.com wrote:
> From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>
>
> Add compatible support for RTQ6053 and RTQ6059.
>
> Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>
Why do you resend the same patches after two days ignoring the feedback?
No versioning, no changelog?
NAK.
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
It seems my or other reviewer's previous comments were not fully
addressed. Maybe the feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you
just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and
either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists