[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231228072702.GA14434@linuxcarl2.richtek.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 15:27:02 +0800
From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
CC: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Uwe
Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
<linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] RTQ6056: Add compatible for the same chip family
On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 08:16:40AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/12/2023 04:51, cy_huang@...htek.com wrote:
> > From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>
> >
> > *** Resend for the '--thread' config in 'git format-patch'.
>
> Resending the same after you receive feedback means you entirely bypass
> that feedback. Don't do this. Ever.
>
Got it. I'm just trying to figure out why Jonathan said the thread cannot be found in
lore.kernel.org. Eventually I found that's the 'thread' option.
When sending v2 patch series, I think I won't forget it in the future.
Not inteneded to bypass the whole suggestion or feedback.
Sorry for that.
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists