lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231228125847.12842-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 15:58:47 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>,
	x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/pat: Simplifying the PAT programming protocol

The programming protocol for the PAT MSR follows the MTRR programming
protocol. However, this protocol is cumbersome and requires disabling
caching (CR0.CD=1), which is not possible on some platforms.

Specifically, a TDX guest is not allowed to set CR0.CD. It triggers
a #VE exception.

Turned out the requirement to follow the MTRR programming protocol for
PAT programming is unnecessarily strict. The new Intel Software
Developer Manual[1] (December 2023) relaxes this requirement. Please
refer to the section titled "Programming the PAT" for more information.

The AMD documentation does not link PAT programming to MTRR.

The kernel only needs to flush the TLB after updating the PAT MSR. The
set_memory code already takes care of flushing the TLB and cache when
changing the memory type of a page.

[1] http://www.intel.com/sdm

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c | 7 ++++---
 arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c       | 9 +++------
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c
index c131c412db89..78afad50a7c0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c
@@ -1118,15 +1118,16 @@ static void cache_cpu_init(void)
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	local_irq_save(flags);
-	cache_disable();
 
-	if (memory_caching_control & CACHE_MTRR)
+	if (memory_caching_control & CACHE_MTRR) {
+		cache_disable();
 		mtrr_generic_set_state();
+		cache_enable();
+	}
 
 	if (memory_caching_control & CACHE_PAT)
 		pat_cpu_init();
 
-	cache_enable();
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c
index de10800cd4dd..7cac1b56c5e7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c
@@ -240,6 +240,8 @@ void pat_cpu_init(void)
 	}
 
 	wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_CR_PAT, pat_msr_val);
+
+	__flush_tlb_all();
 }
 
 /**
@@ -296,13 +298,8 @@ void __init pat_bp_init(void)
 	/*
 	 * Xen PV doesn't allow to set PAT MSR, but all cache modes are
 	 * supported.
-	 * When running as TDX guest setting the PAT MSR won't work either
-	 * due to the requirement to set CR0.CD when doing so. Rely on
-	 * firmware to have set the PAT MSR correctly.
 	 */
-	if (pat_disabled ||
-	    cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_XENPV) ||
-	    cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_TDX_GUEST)) {
+	if (pat_disabled || cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_XENPV)) {
 		init_cache_modes(pat_msr_val);
 		return;
 	}
-- 
2.41.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ