[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8007263d-fe17-454e-92f3-cde218b7ed4f@web.de>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 18:26:06 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@...adcom.com>,
James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
"James E. J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] scsi: lpfc: Delete an unnecessary return statement in
lpfc_sli_read_link_ste()
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 17:45:29 +0100
The script “checkpatch.pl” pointed information out like the following.
WARNING: void function return statements are not generally useful
Thus remove such a statement in the affected function.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
index 93339425ce3c..8de598c9e03b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
@@ -20778,7 +20778,6 @@ lpfc_sli_read_link_ste(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
out:
kfree(rgn23_data);
- return;
}
/**
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists