[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZYzourLcnrxRubaG@google.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:17:14 +0800
From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>
To: Alper Nebi Yasak <alpernebiyasak@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev,
Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@...omium.org>,
Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>, coreboot@...eboot.org,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: coreboot: framebuffer: Avoid invalid zero
physical address
On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 09:25:13PM +0300, Alper Nebi Yasak wrote:
> On ARM64 systems coreboot defers framebuffer allocation to its payload,
> to be done by a libpayload function call. In this case, coreboot tables
> still include a framebuffer entry with display format details, but the
> physical address field is set to zero (as in [1], for example).
>
> Unfortunately, this field is not automatically updated when the
> framebuffer is initialized through libpayload, citing that doing so
> would invalidate checksums over the entire coreboot table [2].
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] firmware: coreboot: framebuffer: Avoid invalid zero physical address
commit: ecea08916418a94f99f89c543303877cb6e08a11
Just realized the bot didn't send the mail for the patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists