[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231229171008.GB9098@thinkpad>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 22:40:08 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Correct USB PHY power
domains
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 02:01:06PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 11:28:27PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > The USB GDSCs are only related to the controllers.
>
> Are you sure?
>
Yes, that's what I was told by UFS and PCIe teams and some of the internal
documentation also confirms the same.
> > The PHYs on the other
> > hand, are powered by VDD_MX and their specific VDDA_PHY/PLL regulators.
> >
> > Fix the power-domains assignment to stop potentially toggling the GDSC
> > unnecessarily.
>
> Again, there's no additional toggling being done here, but yes, this may
> keep the domains enabled during suspend depending on how the driver is
> implemented.
>
> If that's the concern, then please spell that out too.
>
> > Fixes: 152d1faf1e2f ("arm64: dts: qcom: add SC8280XP platform")
>
> May not be needed either.
>
Fixes tag is indeed needed on this platform and all other platforms too.
- Mani
> > @@ -2597,7 +2597,7 @@ usb_2_qmpphy0: phy@...f000 {
> > <&gcc GCC_USB3UNIPHY_PHY_MP0_BCR>;
> > reset-names = "phy", "phy_phy";
> >
> > - power-domains = <&gcc USB30_MP_GDSC>;
> > + power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC8280XP_MX>;
>
> Johan
>
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists