[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <170387457344.3008588.12379397390101428213.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 18:29:33 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com, lgirdwood@...il.com,
peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com, yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com,
ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com, daniel.baluta@....com,
kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de,
festevam@...il.com, linux-imx@....com, sound-open-firmware@...a-project.org,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shengjiu.wang@...il.com,
Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: imx: Add SNDRV_PCM_INFO_BATCH flag
On Wed, 27 Dec 2023 17:27:43 +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> The sof imx pcm device is a device which should support
> double buffering.
>
> Found this issue with pipewire. When there is no
> SNDRV_PCM_INFO_BATCH flag in driver, the pipewire will
> set headroom to be zero, and because sof pcm device
> don't support residue report, when the latency setting
> is small, the "delay" always larger than "target" in
> alsa-pcm.c, that reading next period data is not
> scheduled on time.
>
> [...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: SOF: imx: Add SNDRV_PCM_INFO_BATCH flag
commit: b6190c452a2264ccd88c849b91990fe854a7ec72
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
Powered by blists - more mailing lists