[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87cyunk45e.fsf@protonmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 17:10:26 +0000
From: Rahul Rameshbabu <sergeantsagara@...tonmail.com>
To: Michael Büsch <m@...s.ch>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, b43-dev@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless 5/5] wifi: b43: Support advertising lack of QoS capability
On Sat, 30 Dec, 2023 14:45:23 +0100 Michael Büsch <m@...s.ch> wrote:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> On Sat, 30 Dec 2023 04:51:51 +0000
> Rahul Rameshbabu <sergeantsagara@...tonmail.com> wrote:
>
>> bcm4331 appears to lack QoS support.
>
> I think that's rather unlikely.
> The firmware probably is just too old for this device.
I just retested with newer firmware released on 2012-08-15. I still see
the same issue with QoS. This appears to be the newest firmware I can
acquire from http://lwfinger.com/b43-firmware/, which I extract from
broadcom-wl-6.30.163.46.
[ 11.661972] b43-phy0: Loading firmware version 784.2 (2012-08-15 21:35:19)
[ 11.919942] b43-phy0: Loading firmware version 784.2 (2012-08-15 21:35:19)
[ 13.717460] [drm] amdgpu kernel modesetting enabled.
[ 13.717705] amdgpu: Virtual CRAT table created for CPU
[ 13.717719] amdgpu: Topology: Add CPU node
[ 13.776896] NET: Registered PF_PACKET protocol family
[ 15.234058] b43-phy0: Loading firmware version 784.2 (2012-08-15 21:35:19)
[ 15.319388] wlp3s0b1: authenticate with 1c:87:2c:6f:f4:e0
[ 15.333239] wlp3s0b1: send auth to 1c:87:2c:6f:f4:e0 (try 1/3)
[ 15.341672] wlp3s0b1: authenticated
[ 15.341921] wlp3s0b1: associate with 1c:87:2c:6f:f4:e0 (try 1/3)
[ 15.346912] wlp3s0b1: RX AssocResp from 1c:87:2c:6f:f4:e0 (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=3)
[ 15.347255] wlp3s0b1: associated
>
>> +static const u16 b43_no_qos_chip_ids[] = {
>> + BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM4331,
>> + 0,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static bool b43_qos_not_supported(struct b43_wldev *dev)
>> +{
>> + int idx;
>> +
>> + for (idx = 0; b43_no_qos_chip_ids[idx]; idx++)
>> + if (dev->dev->chip_id == b43_no_qos_chip_ids[idx])
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> static void b43_wireless_core_exit(struct b43_wldev *dev);
>> static int b43_wireless_core_init(struct b43_wldev *dev);
>> static struct b43_wldev * b43_wireless_core_stop(struct b43_wldev *dev);
>> @@ -2587,7 +2603,7 @@ static void b43_request_firmware(struct work_struct *work)
>>
>> start_ieee80211:
>> wl->hw->queues = B43_QOS_QUEUE_NUM;
>> - if (!modparam_qos || dev->fw.opensource)
>> + if (!modparam_qos || dev->fw.opensource || b43_qos_not_supported(wl->current_dev))
>
> This looks a bit over-engineered to me.
> Can we just instead do it like this, please?
>
> if (!modparam_qos || dev->fw.opensource || dev->dev->chip_id == BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM4331)
>
Ack.
>> wl->hw->queues = 1;
>>
>> err = ieee80211_register_hw(wl->hw);
--
Thanks,
Rahul Rameshbabu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists