lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20231231154902.GD6849@unreal> Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023 17:49:02 +0200 From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> To: Lin Ma <linma@....edu.cn> Cc: jgg@...pe.ca, gustavoars@...nel.org, bvanassche@....org, markzhang@...dia.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] RDMA/sa_query: use validate not parser in ib_nl_is_good_resolve_resp On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 01:27:59PM +0800, Lin Ma wrote: > Hello Leon, > > > > The attributes array `tb` in ib_nl_is_good_resolve_resp is never used > > > after the parsing. Therefore use nla_validate_deprecated function here > > > for improvement. > > > > What did this change improve? > > > > To my concern, the nla_validate_deprecated, compared to nla_parse_deprecated, > will at lease save a memset in function nla_parse_deprecated > > ``` > if (tb) > memset(tb, 0, sizeof(struct nlattr *) * (maxtype + 1)); > ``` > > Morever, because the `nla_validate_deprecated` just validate the attributes > array and will not try to retrieve the nla pointers. It shall be faster > and cleaner here :D. We don't care about speed in this path. Let's leave the code as is. Thanks > > Regards > Lin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists