[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZZPQjO91fvB66z1s@x1n>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 16:59:56 +0800
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org,
shuah@...nel.org, aarcange@...hat.com, lokeshgidra@...gle.com,
david@...hat.com, ryan.roberts@....com, hughd@...gle.com,
mhocko@...e.com, axelrasmussen@...gle.com, rppt@...nel.org,
willy@...radead.org, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, jannh@...gle.com,
zhangpeng362@...wei.com, bgeffon@...gle.com, kaleshsingh@...gle.com,
ngeoffray@...gle.com, jdduke@...gle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] userfaultfd: fix move_pages_pte() splitting folio
under RCU read lock
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 06:56:07PM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> @@ -1078,9 +1078,14 @@ static int move_pages_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *dst_pmd, pmd_t *src_pmd,
>
> /* at this point we have src_folio locked */
> if (folio_test_large(src_folio)) {
> + /* split_folio() can block */
> + pte_unmap(&orig_src_pte);
> + pte_unmap(&orig_dst_pte);
> + src_pte = dst_pte = NULL;
> err = split_folio(src_folio);
> if (err)
> goto out;
> + goto retry;
> }
Do we also need to clear src_folio and src_folio_pte? If the folio is a
thp, I think it means it's pte mapped here. Then after the split we may
want to fetch the small folio after the split, not the head one?
--
Peter Xu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists