linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 02/23] PM: EM: Refactor em_cpufreq_update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 09:40:26 +0000
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
To: Qais Yousef <qyousef@...alina.io>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
 rafael@...nel.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com, rui.zhang@...el.com,
 amit.kucheria@...durent.com, amit.kachhap@...il.com,
 daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org, len.brown@...el.com,
 pavel@....cz, mhiramat@...nel.org, wvw@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/23] PM: EM: Refactor
 em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies() arguments



On 12/28/23 16:59, Qais Yousef wrote:
> On 12/19/23 10:30, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/17/23 17:58, Qais Yousef wrote:
>>> On 11/29/23 11:08, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>>>> In order to prepare the code for the modifiable EM perf_state table,
>>>> refactor existing function em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies().
>>>
>>> nit: What is being refactored here? The description is not adding much info
>>> about the change.
>>
>> The function takes the ptr to the table now as its argument. You have
>> missed that in the code below?
> 
> I meant the commit message could be more descriptive if you care to expand on
> it.

I see, yes I will adjust the comment.