linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 0/7] hugetlb: parallelize hugetlb page init on boot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue,  2 Jan 2024 21:12:42 +0800
From: Gang Li <gang.li@...ux.dev>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	ligang.bdlg@...edance.com,
	Gang Li <gang.li@...ux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/7] hugetlb: parallelize hugetlb page init on boot

Hi all, hugetlb init parallelization has now been updated to v3.

This series is tested on next-20240102 and can not be applied to v6.7-rc8.

Update Summary:
- Select CONFIG_PADATA as we use padata_do_multithreaded
- Fix a race condition in h->next_nid_to_alloc
- Fix local variable initialization issues
- Remove RFC tag

Thanks to the testing by David Rientjes, we now know that this patch reduce
hugetlb 1G initialization time from 77s to 18.3s on a 12T machine[4].

# Introduction
Hugetlb initialization during boot takes up a considerable amount of time.
For instance, on a 2TB system, initializing 1,800 1GB huge pages takes 1-2
seconds out of 10 seconds. Initializing 11,776 1GB pages on a 12TB Intel
host takes more than 1 minute[1]. This is a noteworthy figure.

Inspired by [2] and [3], hugetlb initialization can also be accelerated
through parallelization. Kernel already has infrastructure like
padata_do_multithreaded, this patch uses it to achieve effective results
by minimal modifications.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/783f8bac-55b8-5b95-eb6a-11a583675000@google.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200527173608.2885243-1-daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230906112605.2286994-1-usama.arif@bytedance.com/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/all/76becfc1-e609-e3e8-2966-4053143170b6@google.com/

# Test result
        test          no patch(ms)   patched(ms)   saved   
 ------------------- -------------- ------------- -------- 
  256c2t(4 node) 1G           4745          2024   57.34%
  128c1t(2 node) 1G           3358          1712   49.02%
      12t        1G          77000         18300   76.23%

  256c2t(4 node) 2M           3336          1051   68.52%
  128c1t(2 node) 2M           1943           716   63.15%

# Change log
Changes in v3:
- Select CONFIG_PADATA as we use padata_do_multithreaded
- Fix a race condition in h->next_nid_to_alloc
- Fix local variable initialization issues
- Remove RFC tag

Changes in v2:
- https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231208025240.4744-1-gang.li@linux.dev/
- Reduce complexity with `padata_do_multithreaded`
- Support 1G hugetlb

v1:
- https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231123133036.68540-1-gang.li@linux.dev/
- parallelize 2M hugetlb initialization with workqueue

Gang Li (7):
  hugetlb: code clean for hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages
  hugetlb: split hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages
  padata: dispatch works on different nodes
  hugetlb: pass *next_nid_to_alloc directly to
    for_each_node_mask_to_alloc
  hugetlb: have CONFIG_HUGETLBFS select CONFIG_PADATA
  hugetlb: parallelize 2M hugetlb allocation and initialization
  hugetlb: parallelize 1G hugetlb initialization

 fs/Kconfig              |   1 +
 include/linux/hugetlb.h |   2 +-
 include/linux/padata.h  |   3 +
 kernel/padata.c         |   8 +-
 mm/hugetlb.c            | 224 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 mm/mm_init.c            |   1 +
 6 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.1