linux-kernel - [PATCH] ext4: fix uninitialized ratelimit_state->lock access in __ext4_fill

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240102133730.1098120-1-libaokun1@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 21:37:30 +0800
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
To: <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <tytso@....edu>, <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, <jack@...e.cz>,
	<ritesh.list@...il.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<yi.zhang@...wei.com>, <yangerkun@...wei.com>, <yukuai3@...wei.com>,
	<libaokun1@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix uninitialized ratelimit_state->lock access in __ext4_fill_super()

In the following concurrency we will access the uninitialized rs->lock:

ext4_fill_super
  ext4_register_sysfs
   // sysfs registered msg_ratelimit_interval_ms
                             // Other processes modify rs->interval to
                             // non-zero via msg_ratelimit_interval_ms
  ext4_orphan_cleanup
    ext4_msg(sb, KERN_INFO, "Errors on filesystem, "
      __ext4_msg
        ___ratelimit(&(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_msg_ratelimit_state)
          if (!rs->interval)  // do nothing if interval is 0
            return 1;
          raw_spin_trylock_irqsave(&rs->lock, flags)
            raw_spin_trylock(lock)
              _raw_spin_trylock
                __raw_spin_trylock
                  spin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_)
                    lock_acquire
                      __lock_acquire
                        register_lock_class
                          assign_lock_key
                            dump_stack();
  ratelimit_state_init(&sbi->s_msg_ratelimit_state, 5 * HZ, 10);
    raw_spin_lock_init(&rs->lock);
    // init rs->lock here

and get the following dump_stack:

=========================================================
INFO: trying to register non-static key.
The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe
you didn't initialize this object before use?
turning off the locking correctness validator.
CPU: 12 PID: 753 Comm: mount Tainted: G E 6.7.0-rc6-next-20231222 #504
[...]
Call Trace:
 dump_stack_lvl+0xc5/0x170
 dump_stack+0x18/0x30
 register_lock_class+0x740/0x7c0
 __lock_acquire+0x69/0x13a0
 lock_acquire+0x120/0x450
 _raw_spin_trylock+0x98/0xd0
 ___ratelimit+0xf6/0x220
 __ext4_msg+0x7f/0x160 [ext4]
 ext4_orphan_cleanup+0x665/0x740 [ext4]
 __ext4_fill_super+0x21ea/0x2b10 [ext4]
 ext4_fill_super+0x14d/0x360 [ext4]
[...]
=========================================================

Normally interval is 0 until s_msg_ratelimit_state is initialized, so
___ratelimit() does nothing. But registering sysfs precedes initializing
rs->lock, so it is possible to change rs->interval to a non-zero value
via the msg_ratelimit_interval_ms interface of sysfs while rs->lock is
uninitialized, and then a call to ext4_msg triggers the problem by
accessing an uninitialized rs->lock. Therefore register sysfs after all
initializations are complete to avoid such problems.

Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
---
 fs/ext4/super.c | 22 ++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 0980845c8b8f..1db23b0e8a4f 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -5564,19 +5564,15 @@ static int __ext4_fill_super(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb)
 	if (err)
 		goto failed_mount6;
 
-	err = ext4_register_sysfs(sb);
-	if (err)
-		goto failed_mount7;
-
 	err = ext4_init_orphan_info(sb);
 	if (err)
-		goto failed_mount8;
+		goto failed_mount7;
 #ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA
 	/* Enable quota usage during mount. */
 	if (ext4_has_feature_quota(sb) && !sb_rdonly(sb)) {
 		err = ext4_enable_quotas(sb);
 		if (err)
-			goto failed_mount9;
+			goto failed_mount8;
 	}
 #endif  /* CONFIG_QUOTA */
 
@@ -5602,7 +5598,7 @@ static int __ext4_fill_super(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb)
 		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_INFO, "recovery complete");
 		err = ext4_mark_recovery_complete(sb, es);
 		if (err)
-			goto failed_mount10;
+			goto failed_mount9;
 	}
 
 	if (test_opt(sb, DISCARD) && !bdev_max_discard_sectors(sb->s_bdev))
@@ -5619,15 +5615,17 @@ static int __ext4_fill_super(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb)
 	atomic_set(&sbi->s_warning_count, 0);
 	atomic_set(&sbi->s_msg_count, 0);
 
+	/* Register sysfs after all initializations are complete. */
+	err = ext4_register_sysfs(sb);
+	if (err)
+		goto failed_mount9;
+
 	return 0;
 
-failed_mount10:
+failed_mount9:
 	ext4_quotas_off(sb, EXT4_MAXQUOTAS);
-failed_mount9: __maybe_unused
+failed_mount8: __maybe_unused
 	ext4_release_orphan_info(sb);
-failed_mount8:
-	ext4_unregister_sysfs(sb);
-	kobject_put(&sbi->s_kobj);
 failed_mount7:
 	ext4_unregister_li_request(sb);
 failed_mount6:
-- 
2.31.1