linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: crypto: Add Tegra Security Engine

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <SJ1PR12MB63394259681F8AADC7D44438C061A@SJ1PR12MB6339.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 04:27:45 +0000
From: Akhil R <akhilrajeev@...dia.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
	"herbert@...dor.apana.org.au" <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "robh+dt@...nel.org"
	<robh+dt@...nel.org>, "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
	<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, "conor+dt@...nel.org"
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>, "thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, "catalin.marinas@....com"
	<catalin.marinas@....com>, "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>, Mikko
 Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>, "linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "krzk@...nel.org" <krzk@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: crypto: Add Tegra Security Engine

> On 29/12/2023 08:11, Akhil R wrote:
> >> On 28/12/2023 10:33, Akhil R wrote:
> >>>>> +properties:
> >>>>> +  compatible:
> >>>>> +    const: nvidia,tegra234-se4-hash
> >>>>
> >>>> What is se4?
> >>>>
> >>>> Anyway, filename like compatible.
> >>> Similar to the above, the hardware name is SE4.
> >>>
> >>> nvidia,tegra234-se-aes and nvidia,tegra234-se-hash does look good to
> >>> me. But I am a bit concerned about the ABI breakage in case, we need a
> >> different compatible for the remaining instance.
> >>
> >> Isn't this a new device? What ABI breakage? What would be affected?
> >
> > I meant a scenario where we need to support SE1 instance as well.
> >
> > There is one more SE instance in Tegra, which is very similar to SE2 AES Engine.
> > But right now, it does not have a good use case in Linux. Now if we add
> > nvidia,tegra234-se-aes and nvidia,tegra234-se-hash, when SE1 needs to be
> > supported, I guess it would be confusing to find the right compatible for it.
> 
> Hm, I still do not see possibility of breaking of ABI, but sure, se4
> makes sense if instances are really different. Otherwise could be one
> compatible with some property. It kind of depends on the differences.
> 
> Anyway, name the file based on the compatible.
 
One compatible with some property looks to be a good approach to me.
Instances aren't totally different.
So, I will update the compatible to nvidia,tegra234-se-aes and
nvidia,tegra234-se-hash in the next revision.

Thanks for the comments and inputs.

Regards,
Akhil