lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 08:31:15 -0700
From: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@...cinc.com>
To: Qiang Yu <quic_qianyu@...cinc.com>, <mani@...nel.org>
CC: <mhi@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <quic_cang@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_mrana@...cinc.com>, Bhaumik Bhatt <quic_bbhatt@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bus: mhi: host: Add sysfs entry to force device to enter
 EDL

On 12/25/2023 12:47 AM, Qiang Yu wrote:
> From: Bhaumik Bhatt <quic_bbhatt@...cinc.com>
> 
> Forcing the device (eg. SDX75) to enter Emergency Download Mode involves
> writing the 0xEDEDEDED cookie to the channel 91 doorbell register and
> forcing an SOC reset afterwards. Allow users of the MHI bus to exercise the
> sequence using a sysfs entry.

I don't see this documented in the spec anywhere.  Is this standard 
behavior for all MHI devices?

What about devices that don't support EDL mode?

How should the host avoid using this special cookie when EDL mode is not 
desired?

-Jeff

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ