lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6594387015431_151dc12949a@iweiny-mobl.notmuch>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 08:23:12 -0800
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>,
	<linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Alison Schofield
	<alison.schofield@...el.com>, Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, "Ira
 Weiny" <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, Yazen Ghannam
	<yazen.ghannam@....com>, Smita Koralahalli
	<Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] acpi/ghes, cxl: Create a common CXL struct to handle
 different CXL CPER records

Smita Koralahalli wrote:
> Currently defined cxl_cper_callback interface between CXL subsystem and
> GHES module is just confined to handling CXL Component errors only.
> 
> Extend this callback to process CXL Protocol errors as well. Achieve
> by defining a new struct cxl_cper_rec_data to include cxl_cper_event_rec
> and other fields of CXL protocol errors which will be defined in future
> patches.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>

[snip]

>  
>  static int __init cxl_pci_driver_init(void)
> diff --git a/include/linux/cxl-event.h b/include/linux/cxl-event.h
> index 17eadee819b6..afa71ee0437c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cxl-event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cxl-event.h
> @@ -141,8 +141,12 @@ struct cxl_cper_event_rec {
>  	union cxl_event event;
>  } __packed;
>  
> +struct cxl_cper_rec_data {
> +	struct cxl_cper_event_rec rec;

NIT: I would call this something like event to distinguish it from other
record data.

Other than that this seems reasonable to me.

Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>

[snip]

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ