[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6594721656849_151dc12949b@iweiny-mobl.notmuch>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 12:29:10 -0800
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>, Ira Weiny
<ira.weiny@...el.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, "Jonathan
Cameron" <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>, Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>
CC: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>, Davidlohr Bueso
<dave@...olabs.net>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Alison Schofield
<alison.schofield@...el.com>, Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, "Ard
Biesheuvel" <ardb@...nel.org>, <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] cxl/pci: Register for and process CPER events
Smita Koralahalli wrote:
> Hi Ira,
>
> I tested these patches. It works as expected.
>
> Tested-by: Smita-Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Smita-Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>
Thank you!
>
> Since, the trace support for FW-First Protocol errors are missing I
> wrote a patch for it. I reused the existing registered callback
> cxl_cper_callback making some changes to it. Please take a look and let
> me know what you think. I'm not sure if its appropriate to reuse the
> existing callback or define a new one..
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20240102150933.161009-1-Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com/T/#t
Awesome! Yea I just went through it.
Thank you again for all the testing!
Ira
[snip]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists