| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 08:40:34 +0100
From: Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com>
To: Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn>
Cc: loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] LoongArch: Add paravirt interface for guest kernel
On 03.01.24 08:16, Bibo Mao wrote:
> The patch add paravirt interface for guest kernel, it checks whether
> system runs on VM mode. If it is, it will detect hypervisor type. And
> returns true it is KVM hypervisor, else return false. Currently only
> KVM hypervisor is supported, so there is only hypervisor detection
> for KVM type.
I guess you are talking of pv_guest_init() here? Or do you mean
kvm_para_available()?
>
> Signed-off-by: Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>
> ---
> arch/loongarch/Kconfig | 8 ++++
> arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_para.h | 7 ++++
> arch/loongarch/include/asm/paravirt.h | 27 ++++++++++++
> .../include/asm/paravirt_api_clock.h | 1 +
> arch/loongarch/kernel/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/loongarch/kernel/paravirt.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++
> arch/loongarch/kernel/setup.c | 2 +
> 7 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/include/asm/paravirt.h
> create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/include/asm/paravirt_api_clock.h
> create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/kernel/paravirt.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> index ee123820a476..940e5960d297 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> @@ -564,6 +564,14 @@ config CPU_HAS_PREFETCH
> bool
> default y
>
> +config PARAVIRT
> + bool "Enable paravirtualization code"
> + help
> + This changes the kernel so it can modify itself when it is run
> + under a hypervisor, potentially improving performance significantly
> + over full virtualization. However, when run without a hypervisor
> + the kernel is theoretically slower and slightly larger.
> +
> config ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC
> def_bool y
>
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_para.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_para.h
> index 9425d3b7e486..41200e922a82 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_para.h
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/kvm_para.h
> @@ -2,6 +2,13 @@
> #ifndef _ASM_LOONGARCH_KVM_PARA_H
> #define _ASM_LOONGARCH_KVM_PARA_H
>
> +/*
> + * Hypcall code field
> + */
> +#define HYPERVISOR_KVM 1
> +#define HYPERVISOR_VENDOR_SHIFT 8
> +#define HYPERCALL_CODE(vendor, code) ((vendor << HYPERVISOR_VENDOR_SHIFT) + code)
> +
> /*
> * LoongArch hypcall return code
> */
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/paravirt.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/paravirt.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b64813592ba0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/paravirt.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef _ASM_LOONGARCH_PARAVIRT_H
> +#define _ASM_LOONGARCH_PARAVIRT_H
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
> +#include <linux/static_call_types.h>
> +struct static_key;
> +extern struct static_key paravirt_steal_enabled;
> +extern struct static_key paravirt_steal_rq_enabled;
> +
> +u64 dummy_steal_clock(int cpu);
> +DECLARE_STATIC_CALL(pv_steal_clock, dummy_steal_clock);
> +
> +static inline u64 paravirt_steal_clock(int cpu)
> +{
> + return static_call(pv_steal_clock)(cpu);
> +}
> +
> +int pv_guest_init(void);
> +#else
> +static inline int pv_guest_init(void)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#endif // CONFIG_PARAVIRT
> +#endif
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/paravirt_api_clock.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/paravirt_api_clock.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..65ac7cee0dad
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/paravirt_api_clock.h
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +#include <asm/paravirt.h>
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/Makefile b/arch/loongarch/kernel/Makefile
> index 3c808c680370..662e6e9de12d 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MODULES) += module.o module-sections.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_STACKTRACE) += stacktrace.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_PROC_FS) += proc.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PARAVIRT) += paravirt.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += smp.o
>
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/paravirt.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/paravirt.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..21d01d05791a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/paravirt.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#include <linux/export.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/jump_label.h>
> +#include <linux/kvm_para.h>
> +#include <asm/paravirt.h>
> +#include <linux/static_call.h>
> +
> +struct static_key paravirt_steal_enabled;
> +struct static_key paravirt_steal_rq_enabled;
> +
> +static u64 native_steal_clock(int cpu)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +DEFINE_STATIC_CALL(pv_steal_clock, native_steal_clock);
This is the 4th arch with the same definition of native_steal_clock() and
pv_steal_clock. I think we should add a common file kernel/paravirt.c and
move the related functions from the archs into the new file.
If you don't want to do that I can prepare a series.
> +
> +static bool kvm_para_available(void)
> +{
> + static int hypervisor_type;
> + int config;
> +
> + if (!hypervisor_type) {
> + config = read_cpucfg(CPUCFG_KVM_SIG);
> + if (!memcmp(&config, KVM_SIGNATURE, 4))
> + hypervisor_type = HYPERVISOR_KVM;
> + }
> +
> + return hypervisor_type == HYPERVISOR_KVM;
> +}
> +
> +int __init pv_guest_init(void)
> +{
> + if (!cpu_has_hypervisor)
> + return 0;
> + if (!kvm_para_available())
> + return 0;
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/setup.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/setup.c
> index d183a745fb85..fa680bdd0bd1 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
> #include <asm/efi.h>
> #include <asm/loongson.h>
> #include <asm/numa.h>
> +#include <asm/paravirt.h>
> #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
> #include <asm/sections.h>
> #include <asm/setup.h>
> @@ -376,6 +377,7 @@ void __init platform_init(void)
> pr_info("The BIOS Version: %s\n", b_info.bios_version);
>
> efi_runtime_init();
> + pv_guest_init();
Any reason pv_guest_init() needs to return a value at all, seeing that you don't
use the returned value?
Juergen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists