[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240103114957.GD1073466@pevik>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 12:49:57 +0100
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@...e.cz>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: ltp@...ts.linux.it, Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@...e.cz>,
Li Wang <liwang@...hat.com>,
Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@...e.com>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@...aro.org>,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/36] Remove UCLINUX from LTP
Hi Geert,
> Hi Petr,
> CC other uClinux arch lists
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 2:52 AM Petr Vorel <pvorel@...e.cz> wrote:
> > UCLINUX is broken in LTP and nobody really cares. Actually I dare to
> > say UCLINUX is dead. Therefore I prepared patchset to remove UCLINUX
> > from LTP. We have been actively removing UCLINUX from LTP during rewrite
> > tests to new LTP API. This removes the rest from the old tests (which
> > will be sooner or later rewritten to new API).
> > Because the patchset is quite big, I did not want to send it to mailing
> > lists (but I can do it if you want).
> > Can you please have look at my fork on gitlab, branch: remove-UCLINUX
> > https://gitlab.com/pevik/ltp/-/commits/remove-UCLINUX?ref_type=heads
> > Build test:
> > https://github.com/pevik/ltp/actions/runs/7392470215
> Thanks for your series!
Thank you for your feedback. May I add your Acked-by: tag to the series when we
agree to merge?
> I see you only CCed linux-m68k, but AFAIK, uClinux is not restricted
> to m68k/coldfire, but also available on arm32, riscv, sh, and xtensa.
Good point, I'll reply to their lists as well.
Kind regards,
Petr
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> Geert
Powered by blists - more mailing lists