[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <368446.1704290657@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 14:04:17 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...nel.org>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
Paulo Alcantara <pc@...guebit.com>,
Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@...rosoft.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>, linux-cachefs@...hat.com,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
v9fs@...ts.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@...debyte.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 9p: Fix initialisation of netfs_inode for 9p
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org> wrote:
> Would it make sense to just always update netfs's ctx->remote_i_size in
> the various stat2inode calls instead?
Btw, v9fs_i_size_write() should be redundant. It should be sufficient to just
use i_size_write() as long as you use i_size_read().
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists